Locate the Croydon commercial demise beyond its street frontage
Croydon's central appraisal records the narrow Bell Hill alley and Crown Hill rear elevations overhanging it. It also identifies Overton's and Fellmongers Yards off Surrey Street as survivals of industrial yards. For a commercial lease instruction, show whether the demise includes a street-facing unit, accommodation behind it or a separate yard interest. The historical account does not establish present access rights, trading use or the boundaries of the lease. Obtain the executed plan, relevant licences and current occupation information before treating a visible rear route as part of the tenant's repairing obligation.
A lease-end schedule should distinguish the shopfront, upper fabric, rear enclosure and shared installations rather than apply one allowance to the whole address. Ask which party maintains each component and identify the covenant or licence relevant to an alleged breach. Keep any condition schedule with the provision incorporating it into the tenancy documents. Its practical value depends on that relationship, not simply on the existence of old photographs. If more than one Croydon unit has been combined internally, mark the original divisions and subsequent openings without assuming that a continuous trading space creates one legal demise.
Local evidence: Croydon: Central Croydon appraisal, sections 3.1, 3.3 and 6.1.
Match the schedule to Croydon's different commercial building generations
The appraisal distinguishes the interwar group at 25–45 George Street from Victorian commercial buildings and records different brick and stone detailing. An instruction spanning adjoining premises therefore needs each building and component identified separately. Establish whether the survey concerns obligations during the term, an approaching expiry or the condition after the tenant has left. An interim schedule, terminal assessment and later check of completed work should retain their own inspection dates and evidence. The same room reference can then be followed without presenting observations made after strip-out as though they were visible during occupation.
For the actual George Street premises, separate repairs to retained fabric from decoration and removal or reinstatement of tenant alterations. A new shopfit, partition, service penetration and altered entrance may have different documentary histories. Request the licences, drawings and any notices relevant to the proposed reinstatement. An item should explain the alleged breach, location and remedy, with measurement and cost where required. The RICS dilapidations professional standard informs that reporting process. A visual inspection of accessible fabric should state its limitations and should not be represented as performance testing of every mechanical or electrical installation serving the building.
Local evidence: Croydon: Central Croydon appraisal, sections 3.1, 3.3 and 6.1; RICS: Dilapidations in England and Wales.
Test a proposed George Street refit against the actual loss claim
Historic commercial variety in central Croydon does not prove what a landlord intends to do after lease expiry. If a proposed refurbishment, change of layout or redevelopment is relevant, obtain the actual scheme, decisions and programme. Identify the roof, frontage, partitions or services it would affect and compare those components with the schedule. A marketing suggestion, a planning enquiry and an instructed contract have different evidential status. Do not assume that a repair is superseded because an older building sits beside a newer one, or that every item remains a loss merely because it appears in a contractor's estimate.
For repairing-covenant damages, section 18(1) requires consideration of the diminution limit and its specified demolition or structural-alteration circumstances. Apply the relevant legal and valuation analysis to the particular lease; a single percentage discount across unrelated obligations is not a substitute. The landlord's Quantified Demand needs an evidenced loss case, which may differ from the cost of carrying out the schedule. Where the tenant relies on future works making a remedy unnecessary, identify the item and supporting material. Croydon's town-centre setting supplies no automatic assumption about rental demand, conversion plans or the value effect of this building's condition.
Local evidence: Croydon: Central Croydon appraisal, sections 3.1, 3.3 and 6.1; Landlord and Tenant Act 1927, section 18.
Cost Bell Hill access and terracotta repairs as identified operations
The appraisal identifies detailed terracotta at 42–44 George Street, including shopfront cornices and pilasters. Where the leased premises contain comparable modelled fabric, record the actual component and proposed treatment rather than price an undefined replacement frontage. Obtain suitable technical advice on repair and the current permissions position. If access would use Bell Hill or a rear yard, establish clearance, control and the proposed equipment footprint. A heritage description does not demonstrate today's condition, and an old industrial-yard use does not authorise a contractor's loading, storage or working arrangement. Keep those assumptions visible in the estimate.
Separate permanent repairs from temporary protection, access equipment and making good, explaining how each cost relates to an alleged obligation. The commercial termination protocol provides the route for exchanging a supported schedule, Quantified Demand and reasoned response. Maintain a consistent item numbering system so photographs, invoices, tenant comments and changes after a final inspection can be reconciled. A Croydon enquiry should include the property address, landlord or tenant position, executed lease, licences, condition records, relevant schedule and the decision deadline. Agree the scope of inspection and any specialist advice before treating a broad building description as a complete claim specification.
Local evidence: Croydon: Central Croydon appraisal, sections 3.1, 3.3 and 6.1; Civil Procedure Rules: Dilapidations Protocol.
Croydon lease-end questions
Does an industrial-yard description establish access for Croydon lease-end repairs?
No. Establish current ownership, occupation, permissions and the proposed working method for the actual yard. The historical reference helps identify questions but cannot justify an access allowance or show that the tenant must bear it under the lease.
Should adjoining George Street units share one repair specification?
Identify their building phases, materials and lease boundaries first. A continuous occupation or shopfront can conceal separate fabric and obligations. Describe the affected components and documentary basis of each remedy instead of assuming one rate or scope applies throughout.
Does a landlord's refit proposal automatically defeat every repair item?
Compare the actual scheme with the particular remedy and explain the relevant evidence. Some work may be affected while other items require separate analysis. Obtain legal and valuation advice where repairing-covenant damages, diminution or supersession are in issue.
What should a terracotta repair allowance identify?
Name the modelled component, current condition evidence, proposed treatment and necessary access. Distinguish specialist repair from replacement or improvement. The appraisal's description of 42–44 George Street is architectural context, not proof of a present defect or a tenant's liability.
Related guidance: London dilapidations advice; lease condition records; licence to alter.
Croydon Schedule of Dilapidations Enquiry (From £1,250 plus VAT)
Content updated: October 2026.
Other Croydon surveying services
- RICS Level 3 Building Survey in Croydon
- RICS Home Surveys in Croydon
- Redacted RICS Level 3 sample reports
Need a RICS survey quote in Croydon? We confirm a fixed fee after scoping. Call 020 7101 4590, email enquiries@hampsteadcharteredsurveyors.co.uk, or inspect our redacted RICS Level 3 sample reports. Sample reports.