Contract Administration in Putney

The Embankment’s boathouses, residential frontages and river-facing rear elevations create different questions for Putney works. Select the relevant property and conservation record before setting out the contract scope. Access, permissions and present occupation need their own evidence; the waterside setting does not provide an automatic working area.

HCS cannot act as independent contract administrator where HCS is the contractor. Confirm the appointment and executed form; NEC roles differ.

Scope and fees

Measure the boathouse plot instead of assuming open land behind it

The Putney Embankment appraisal describes boathouses with differing orientations: some present long elevations to the river, while narrower frontages extend back towards neighbouring houses. It also records little space between buildings and associated sheds. For an instructed repair, survey the actual plot and determine where access equipment, materials and waste can be handled. Confirm the rights and practical limits of every proposed position. The contractor’s tender should show the method and protection priced for those constraints. If investigation or consultation requires a different setup, document that change and its reason so the administrator can assess a specific revised arrangement rather than an assumed spacious riverside site.

Coordinate works with the Embankment’s river access

Wandsworth’s appraisal explains the close relationship between the boathouses, roadway and slipway, with activity extending between the buildings and river. A construction proposal in that setting needs a current operational discussion, not merely a photograph of an empty frontage. Establish the users affected, the area under each party’s control and the acceptable timing and protection for the instructed work. Include any agreed requirement to keep a route available in the tender constraints. Record the accepted sequence and communication responsibilities. The administrator can then compare a request for different access with the original arrangement and retain evidence of the authorised response and any resulting change to the works.

Include the river-facing rear elevation at Ruvigny Gardens

The appraisal identifies the rear elevations of Ruvigny Gardens as part of the Embankment scene, with gabled forms intended to be seen from the river. For a property in that group, avoid using front and rear as shorthand for important and unimportant repair areas. Survey the instructed elevation and obtain advice on the features affected by the proposal. Show the exact limits, access route and protection requirements, including interfaces with the garden and adjoining property. The work schedule and later instructions should use consistent elevation references. At completion, the administrator can check the agreed components and unresolved details against those records instead of an imprecise whole-building description.

Trace the service side of the High Street terrace through Weimar Street

The council’s Putney appraisal notes the view of the rear of the High Street terrace from Weimar Street. For repairs which reach that service side, obtain present plans and identify the current relationship between upper accommodation, commercial premises and external spaces. An old rear view cannot establish ownership, access or the route of current services. Define what must remain operational while the works proceed and ask the contractor to price the agreed constraints. Record any investigation needed before altering connections or making good. The administrator should retain instructions by location and element, so the final account can distinguish the original rear-elevation package from later authorised additions.

JCT tender preparation: Putney

A Putney Embankment-area tender should distinguish a shop terrace, Ruvigny Gardens house or mansion block in the actual scope drawings. Identify the employer's interest and any shared entrance or roof that needs a separate arrangement. Discuss JCT selection with the available design information and specialist responsibility stated, rather than selecting a form simply from the riverside address. Ask contractors to price access, protection and reinstatement against common assumptions. Where one return excludes a rear component or proposes a different repair, obtain a coordinated scope decision before acceptance. The final tender schedule should retain the quantities, qualifications and drawing versions that support the contract sum.

Wandsworth’s Putney Embankment appraisal distinguishes High Street shop terraces, the houses of Ruvigny Gardens and later mansion-flat blocks. These named examples explain different residential forms within the riverside conservation setting. They provide historical context for a purchase enquiry, rather than a single construction description or a finding of flood damage across Putney.

A house drawing should identify its original footprint and additions. For a mansion flat, locate the unit within the shared building; for accommodation over a shop, identify the separate residential approach.

Ask the managing agent to identify which spaces can be opened for the agreed inspection. Keep the flat’s own window or bathroom papers separate from the common-roof programme.

Ask who can provide access to the particular shared stair or back roof raised in the brief. An invoice for work inside the commercial premises should be connected to the residential question only when its scope identifies the relevant component. Unavailable access should be recorded before an appointment is scoped.

Check current requirements for the particular property and proposed work.

• Wandsworth: Putney Embankment appraisal, sections 4 and 9
• Wandsworth: Putney Embankment Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Strategy

• Major works
• Tendering
• Clerk of Works
• Employer's Agent
• Insurance reinstatement

• Putney area guide
• South West London area hub

Professional profiles · RICS regulation